Agentic AI in Aqueduct

Agentic AI for facilities management that diagnoses, acts with approval and verifies

Agentic AI for facilities management is software that reads live building data, diagnoses what is wrong, proposes or takes a bounded action and checks the result. In Aqueduct, agents read telemetry and the digital twin, route work into your CMMS, act only where control is enabled with owner approval, verify the outcome at the meter and explain every step in plain language.

Powered by aQ Core and aQ Assistant, with aQ PredictIQ and Smart Controls
Panel meters showing frequency, voltage and current
How does this week compare to the last few weeks?
12% below last week, driven by lower HVAC load on weekday afternoons. Two days had low meter coverage.
Demo data
Command history · RTU-2
Occupied mode07:00 · executed
Economizer on07:12 · executed
Lockout active07:13 · held
Demo data

Agents that read the site, act inside limits you set, and prove the result.

Diagnose from live data

Agents that read the twin before they recommend anything

  • Three live streams

    The Event Engine reads sensor, asset and control streams, so every investigation starts from current readings.

  • Command against feedback

    Failed starts, uncommanded running, units left in manual and stuck valves surface from commanded versus reported state.

  • Grounded knowledge

    A knowledge base of equipment and site context keeps each diagnosis tied to your plant, not generic advice.

Charts on a tablet
AHU-1 · fault
Supply fan stopped08:02
Failed rotor shaft08:03
Routed to CMMS08:04
Airflow confirmed11:40
Demo data
Bounded action

Changes proposed inside limits and approved by the owner

  • Owner approval

    Actions run only where control is enabled and the owner has approved that kind of change on that asset.

  • Desired versus reported

    Shadow decisions compare what a device was told with what it reports before any further command goes out.

  • Lockouts and queues

    Lockouts stop new commands mid-action, and fast, slow and lifecycle queues keep every command in order.

Control panel switches
Command history · RTU-2
Occupied mode07:00 · executed
Economizer on07:12 · executed
Lockout active07:13 · held
Demo data
Verify and explain

Every outcome checked at the meter and explained plainly

  • Measured result

    After the action, use is compared with the weather-normalized baseline and the saving is priced from your rates.

  • Plain-language account

    The agent states what it saw, what it did, who approved it and what changed, in operator language.

  • Replayable record

    The command log and archived raw data let anyone replay the decision and check the result later.

Streams of data on a screen
How does this week compare to the last few weeks?
12% below last week, driven by lower HVAC load on weekday afternoons. Two days had low meter coverage.
Demo data
Old way vs the Aqueduct way

Facility AI, before and after Aqueduct agents

The old way
  • Alerts fire and a person still has to diagnose them.
  • Chat tools answer from the internet, not your meters.
  • Automation writes setpoints with no approval and no record.
  • A work order closes and the saving is simply assumed.
  • Nobody can say afterwards why the system did that.
The Aqueduct way
  • Agents diagnose the cause from live telemetry and the twin.
  • Answers come from your telemetry, twin and command history.
  • Actions need owner approval and stay inside set limits.
  • The meter confirms the result against a weather-normalized baseline.
  • The command log shows what was done, who approved it, and why.
Problem

Why facility AI usually stops at the alert

Most tools either raise an alarm and walk away, or act with nobody watching. Neither earns an owner's trust.

01

Alerts without a diagnosis

A threshold fires and a person still has to work out which component failed, why, and whether it matters.

02

Chat without your data

General AI tools answer from the internet, not from your meters, your digital twin or your command history.

03

Automation without guardrails

Rules that write setpoints with no approval, no lockout and no log are a risk owners will not accept.

04

Fixes nobody checks

A work order closes and the saving is assumed. Nobody goes back to the meter to see whether it held.

How it works

What Aqueduct agents do

Read, diagnose, propose, act or route, verify, explain. Every step is logged.

01

Read the live site

Agents read sensor, asset and control telemetry on a 60-second refresh, plus the digital twin that shows how equipment connects.

02

Diagnose the cause

They compare commanded state with reported state, trend use against baseline and correlate water, energy and air to name the likely cause.

03

Propose a bounded action

Each proposal names the asset, the change, the expected effect and the limits it must stay inside, in plain language.

04

Act or route

Where control is enabled with owner approval, the change goes to the device. Otherwise a ticket goes to your CMMS with the evidence attached.

05

Verify and explain

After the change, the agent checks the meter against baseline, records the result and explains what happened and why.

Architecture

The architecture behind the agents

Agents run on the same aQ Core data layer as every Aqueduct product, in the AWS cloud or on-prem on NVIDIA infrastructure.

LayerWhat it isWhat it does for the agent
ReasoningA LangGraph agent on Bedrock AgentCore on AWS, with a knowledge basePlans multi-step investigations and grounds answers in equipment and site knowledge
Event EngineReads the sensor, asset and control streams togetherRaises the events agents investigate, with the readings attached
Device shadowsClassic and named shadows holding desired and reported state per field deviceShows whether equipment did what it was told
Shadow decisionsBedrock-assisted reasoning over the gap between desired and reported stateSeparates a slow response from a fault before another command is sent
Command queuesFast, slow and lifecycle queues behind the Control APIKeeps urgent commands from waiting behind routine ones
Command logEvery command, its approval and what the device reported backThe audit trail for M&V, procurement and safety reviews
NotificationsEmail and SMS to the responsible rolePuts approvals and findings in front of the right person
Data center aisle lit in blue
What we believe

An agent earns trust by showing its evidence, its approval and its result.

Talk to our team
Guardrails

Guardrails built into every action

Agents act inside limits the owner sets, and everything they do can be replayed.

Human in the loop

Owners decide which assets agents may act on, and which actions need a person to approve them first.

Lockouts

Lockout warnings block new commands while an earlier command is still being acted on, preventing short cycling.

Bounded actions

Actions stay inside configured setpoint ranges, schedules and comfort limits. Anything outside goes to a person.

Read-only where required

On read-only sites the data path is outbound only. Agents recommend and route work, and write nothing.

Permissions respected

Every API call is checked, and answers use only the data the signed-in user is allowed to see.

Full audit trail

Commands, approvals and results land in the command log, and raw sensor data is archived for replay.

One incident, start to finish

One agent investigation, start to finish

An illustrative refrigeration case at a food plant.

Monitor

Compressor power, discharge pressure, condenser water flow and cooling output report into aQ Core.

Measure

Electricity use for one refrigeration group rises while cooling output stays similar under comparable conditions.

Identify

The agent reviews power and pressure trends, finds signs of poor heat removal and recommends a condenser water flow and cooling tower check.

Act

A work order goes to the CMMS. The engineer confirms the cause and approves the flow correction or cleaning.

Verify

Total refrigeration energy, including any added pumping, is compared before and after. The result becomes the new baseline.

Who it is for

Questions agents answer in plain language

Facility head
“Where did water keep flowing overnight?”

Branch flow, event duration and volume for the period, with the line where the balance stopped closing.

Energy manager
“Which loads explain yesterday's electricity increase?”

Feeder and meter readings compared with an earlier period, with the loads that moved named.

Plant engineer
“Which refrigeration group used more energy per unit of cooling?”

Matched cooling duty and electrical input under comparable operating conditions, with the period shown.

Questions

Common questions

Agentic AI in facilities management is software that does more than answer questions: it reads live data, diagnoses problems, proposes or takes bounded actions and checks the outcome. In Aqueduct, agents work from the same telemetry and digital twin as every product, act only where control is enabled with owner approval, and verify results at the meter.

Yes, when actions are bounded and approved. Aqueduct agents act only where control is enabled with owner approval, stay inside configured limits, respect lockouts that prevent short cycling, and log every command with its result. On read-only sites, agents recommend and route work instead.

No. Aqueduct routes work into your existing CMMS with the asset, the evidence and a recommended fix. Your team keeps managing technicians, inventory and work order workflow there, and Aqueduct confirms at the meter whether the fix worked.

A device shadow holds the desired state a controller was given and the state it actually reported back. Aqueduct uses the gap between the two in Bedrock-assisted shadow decisions, so an agent can tell a slow response from a failed actuator before it sends another command.

Aqueduct runs a LangGraph agent on Bedrock AgentCore on AWS with a knowledge base, alongside optimization and predictive maintenance models. Sites that need it can run AI on-prem on NVIDIA infrastructure. Milvian AI is an NVIDIA Inception member and an AWS Advanced Tier Partner.

aQ Assistant is the plain-language interface: ask about a site, zone or device and it answers from your data, including a warning when data coverage is too thin to trust. The agents work behind it, investigating events, proposing actions and verifying outcomes, and they explain themselves through the same interface.

In Aqueduct, every command, approval and device response is written to the command log, and every change to entity data lands in a change log. Raw sensor data is archived for replay, so an auditor can see what the agent saw, what it did and what the meter showed afterwards.

Yes. Aqueduct can read beside an existing BMS, replace it, or be built into a new building. Equipment connects over BACnet or Modbus through a field device network controller, and where Aqueduct only reads, the BMS alarms remain the operational ones.

See Aqueduct on your own facility.

Bring a site, a utility bill or a question. We will show you where the loss is.